|
|
|
N°15 |
Editorial Several countries in the "ZSP" (zone de solidarité prioritaire ? France's priority solidarity area) have set the ball rolling (Senegal, Morocco, Ivory Coast, Central African Republic). But most privatizations are still to come and will require an increasingly customized response. For although the need for privatization and liberalization, each in their own way, is self-evident, the extent of the reform, what steps to take and how to take them, are still open to question. The debate centres on the following key issues: the specific type of privatization for each public service; the specific nature of each sector (water, electricity, telecommunications, railways) which determines economic and institutional logical approaches: geographical or function-based breakdowns, the importance of regulations to control any monopoly situations and, more broadly, supervise the way competition works; the diversity of legal procedures (continuing or discontinuing State involvement, concessions, lease and operate agreements etc.); the role of donor organizations and financial instruments (market-friendly or concession-based) to be proposed according to the types of investment. Liberalization/privatization
operations have much to gain from four-way partnerships bringing together
the conceding public authorities, private sector contractors, international
donors and financial institutions that mobilize local savings. The examples
of "experience feedback" described in this Lettre de l'Isted
throw considerable light on the global public/private partnership issue.
Antoine Pouillieute, Contents
Return to the last issue
| ||||||